@dougharms3
Profil
Registrierung: vor 1 Monat
Minute Taking Training: Building Confidence in Meeting Roles
How Traditional Minutes Are Sabotaging Business Success - Real Talk from the Boardroom
Sitting through another pointless executive session last month, I witnessed the all too common ritual of intelligent individuals reduced into glorified note taking machines.
The problem that most businesses ignore: most minute taking is a total misuse of human talent that creates the illusion of documentation while genuinely blocking meaningful work from happening.
I've invested nearly twenty years advising throughout the country, and I can tell you that traditional minute taking has developed into one of the most counterproductive habits in corporate workplaces .
We've built a system where documenting discussions has become more important than facilitating productive conversations.
Let me describe the most insane minute taking nightmare I've ever experienced.
I watched a project review meeting where the most senior expert in the room - a senior industry specialist - spent the entire two hour writing minutes instead of contributing their valuable knowledge.
This professional was earning $120,000 per year and had twenty years of professional experience. Instead of engaging their valuable expertise to the conversation they were acting as a overpaid secretary.
So they had multiple separate people producing multiple different versions of the same meeting. The expert person creating detailed records, the audio documentation, the transcription of the recording, and any additional records various participants were creating.
The meeting addressed critical issues about product direction, but the professional most equipped to guide those decisions was completely focused on recording all insignificant comment instead of contributing meaningfully.
The combined expense for capturing this individual conference was over $2,500, and literally zero of the documentation was ever used for any meaningful objective.
The absurdity was completely lost on them. They were throwing away their best valuable resource to generate minutes that nobody would ever review afterwards.
The expectation of digital efficiency has backfired spectacularly when it comes to meeting documentation.
We've advanced from basic handwritten summaries to sophisticated multi platform record keeping environments that require groups of people to maintain.
I've consulted with companies where staff now waste longer time managing their electronic conference outputs than they spent in the original meetings being recorded.
The cognitive burden is unsustainable. Workers aren't contributing in discussions more effectively - they're merely handling more digital burden.
This might challenge some people, but I believe detailed minute taking is frequently a legal theatre that has minimal connection to do with real responsibility.
I've conducted thorough compliance requirement analyses for numerous local businesses across different fields, and in almost every case, the required minute taking is basic compared to their implemented procedures.
I've consulted with companies that spend thousands of resources on sophisticated documentation systems because a person at some point advised them they must have detailed records for legal reasons.
When I investigate the real regulatory obligations for their sector, the reality are typically far more straightforward than their existing procedures.
Genuine accountability comes from clear outcomes, not from comprehensive records of all comment said in a meeting.
What are the approaches to traditional minute taking dysfunction?
Capture the things that matter: commitments agreed, actions agreed, and due dates established.
I advise a simple three part approach: Key decisions made, Action assignments with assigned individuals and deadlines, Next meetings required.
Any else is documentation waste that creates absolutely no utility to the organisation or its outcomes.
Second, share the minute taking duty instead of assigning it to your highest senior team participants.
If you absolutely must extensive minutes, allocate the task to someone whose core contribution to the organisation isnt their professional thinking.
Create straightforward categories: No records for informal check ins, Essential decision recording for operational business sessions, Thorough record keeping for high stakes conferences.
The investment of dedicated minute taking support is typically far cheaper than the productivity impact of forcing high value people spend their time on documentation tasks.
Stop the practice of asking your best valuable team members to waste their time on clerical work.
If you definitely need detailed session records, use specialist documentation resources or allocate the responsibility to support employees who can learn from the professional development.
Limit formal documentation for conferences where decisions have contractual significance, where different stakeholders need agreed records, or where complex project initiatives must be tracked over time.
The key is ensuring deliberate choices about minute taking approaches based on real circumstances rather than defaulting to a universal procedure to every conferences.
The daily cost of specialist administrative support is almost always much less than the opportunity loss of having senior professionals spend their time on clerical tasks.
Use automated platforms to support productive record keeping, not to generate more bureaucratic overhead.
The most practical digital tools I've seen are seamless - they automate the routine components of record keeping without requiring new effort from session attendees.
The secret is implementing systems that support your decision making objectives, not tools that become focuses in their own right.
The aim is digital tools that supports focus on important discussion while efficiently managing the essential documentation.
The aim is technology that facilitates focus on valuable conversation while seamlessly processing the necessary documentation tasks.
The insight that totally transformed how I think about workplace documentation:
Meaningful accountability comes from clear agreements and consistent follow through, not from detailed records of discussions.
The organisations that reliably achieve remarkable business outcomes prioritise their conference energy on establishing strategic choices and ensuring reliable execution.
On the other hand, I've encountered organisations with elaborate record keeping procedures and inconsistent accountability because they confused paper trails instead of results.
The value of a meeting resides in the quality of the decisions established and the actions that result, not in the detail of the documentation produced.
The true benefit of each meeting resides in the impact of the outcomes established and the results that follow, not in the thoroughness of the documentation created.
Prioritise your resources on enabling processes for excellent decision making, and the accountability will emerge automatically.
Invest your resources in creating effective environments for superior decision making, and appropriate documentation will emerge organically.
The most fundamental truth about meeting success:
Documentation must facilitate results, not become more important than thinking.
Documentation should facilitate results, not control thinking.
All else is merely corporate performance that wastes precious energy and distracts from real activities.
Here is more info on the importance of taking minutes during the meeting have a look at our own web page.
Website: https://educatorpages.com/site/Besttrainingprogram/pages/minute-takers-taking-meeting-minutes
Foren
Eröffnete Themen: 0
Verfasste Antworten: 0
Forum-Rolle: Teilnehmer